And the beat goes on...3
Do not be fooled, you little righteous rightie peeps! Anita and Van will still be around, Mark Lloyd, Carol Browner, Robert McChesney, Cass Sunstein, Ayers, etc. etc. will still be worshipping at the altar of Mao, Chavez, Castro and the Marx Bros...
And guess what? As added bonus from the election of '08 Iran and North Korea will be able to send us to Kingdom come with impunity, given the clear thinking decisiveness shown so far by 'our dear leader,' and the love and respect he will have garnered for us from all the countries of the world who used to hate us. Isn't that fabulous?
Sarcasm apart, truth is, America will not be safe until these bunch of radical baboons is finally sent off to one of their favorite dictarorships, among them Cuba (there's a vacancy coming up at Gitmo, I hear!) or even to Venezuela, where Mark Lloyd says they are having 'an incredible democratic revolution'. This one, we are told is not 'astroturf', it comes complete with all the fun accoutrements of a "genuine people driven social movement," such as gulags, bullet pocked walls where people with eyes bandaged will be allowed to enjoy one last cigarette; with random assassination of political opponents, and with the ever-so wonderful and essential take-over of communications... Can you sit still and wait for all this fun?
Just hope the crowd of libtards don't spoil it for us it by being overly anxious. Those nervous Nellys, should cool their heels for a while, just crack their proletarian knuckles to relieve tension, and keep on repeating the following hopeful mantras while clicking their heels: "Be still my little heart..! There's no place like home..! All things work for the good of those who love Mao..!
Meanwhile, those of us so heartbroken by the sudden demise of Anita.. let's intone this catchy little tune: Ding Dunn.. the witch is dead...
Friday, November 13, 2009
And the beat goes on.. 2
Yet, fear not little flock of democRATS, Anita's was probably just a horizontal move, much like that of Van Jones. Ya know.. these vermin are either cloned, re-incarnated, or just re-appear under a different designation, in a different department... somewhere, somehow ...they seem to have more lives than a cat. They will most likely still be serving the purposes of the party. In their case I am reminded of those villains in Greek mythology: the HYDRAS. No sooner one of their heads is lopped off, when 10 more re-appear. Lawrdy, lawrd... will someone rid us of these useless toxic ass-ets... 2010 cannot come soon enough! --
As for you, the virtuous crowd of the "righteous righties", here's a word of encouragement: This too shall pass! But just wait, sometime when next year's political campaign is in full swing, we will start to see the 'enormous beneficial effects' of that giant scam perpetrated upon us: The "Stimulus Package" version #1! Oh yes, there are more to come! This wealth-re-distributing admin is insatiable, until stopped.Very suddenly, I'm sure, we'll see the economy appear to be improving; the government will stuff the bureaucratic ranks with useless drones collecting at our expense enormous paychecks and benefits to make it appear as though more jobs have been created. Pork barrel projects will start moving; Bwaney Fwank will make his boyfriend remove pot garden from his backyard and bongs from his parlor and bedroom, to appear even more virtuous than he already is! Europe will once again pucker- up in the direction of the good ol' USA. Peace and harmony will reign anew, and a new Age of Aquarius will seem to lull the voters into thinking Obi-wan-canIdiot has things under control, just in time for mid-term elections.
Yet, fear not little flock of democRATS, Anita's was probably just a horizontal move, much like that of Van Jones. Ya know.. these vermin are either cloned, re-incarnated, or just re-appear under a different designation, in a different department... somewhere, somehow ...they seem to have more lives than a cat. They will most likely still be serving the purposes of the party. In their case I am reminded of those villains in Greek mythology: the HYDRAS. No sooner one of their heads is lopped off, when 10 more re-appear. Lawrdy, lawrd... will someone rid us of these useless toxic ass-ets... 2010 cannot come soon enough! --
As for you, the virtuous crowd of the "righteous righties", here's a word of encouragement: This too shall pass! But just wait, sometime when next year's political campaign is in full swing, we will start to see the 'enormous beneficial effects' of that giant scam perpetrated upon us: The "Stimulus Package" version #1! Oh yes, there are more to come! This wealth-re-distributing admin is insatiable, until stopped.Very suddenly, I'm sure, we'll see the economy appear to be improving; the government will stuff the bureaucratic ranks with useless drones collecting at our expense enormous paychecks and benefits to make it appear as though more jobs have been created. Pork barrel projects will start moving; Bwaney Fwank will make his boyfriend remove pot garden from his backyard and bongs from his parlor and bedroom, to appear even more virtuous than he already is! Europe will once again pucker- up in the direction of the good ol' USA. Peace and harmony will reign anew, and a new Age of Aquarius will seem to lull the voters into thinking Obi-wan-canIdiot has things under control, just in time for mid-term elections.
And the beat goes on..
Tsk, tsk... so Anita Dunn, WH Communications Director, and one more skunk in the middle of Obamanure's socialist highway, finally became ROADKILL; and all for the sake of expediency within this Neo-commie administration, which does not hesitate to eat its own when they become 'inconvenient'. Well, BOO-FREAKING-HOO!
Having worked under Mao-Bama's mouthpiece, Robert Gibbs (the WH's very own 'Michelin man', lard-butt and blimp-boy) whose job is to daily spout off the party line, then defend, spin, sugar-coat and conceal its full intent and toxicity. Policy, widely believed, is really dictated by those two utterly charming hatchet men, Rahmbo and AXelrod (how appropriate!). Anita was just the last rung on the responsibility-for -blunders ladder, and as such imminently expendable. As such then, having taken on a bigger enemy than Obi, Ra and AX could handle, she has become the 'casualty du jour.'
But let's be realistic here, M-Obidick plays only a minor role in the ideological chain of command; he's turned out to be the 'executor' of the orders, and the most prominent face fronting for the "Internationale" busy at work in present day Amerikka. And isn't that a swooning, breathless gathering of MSM suck-up sycophants, hanging on every word that comes from above, during the daily exercise of wasted time that goes by the name of " press conference"?
Still, the sad news about Anita deserves a moment of silence , let's not be as callous as Obummer who, while more occupied in a 'shout out' about Indian rights, was finally forced to address the 'man caused disaster' at Fort Hood. He was loath to call it what it what it was: a terrorist attack, as he urged 'not to jump to conclusions.'
So, one more hag thrown under the bus! -- But who's counting.. there's more where that one came from. Among the vast rolls of ACORN and SEIU, among the long list of 'socially redeemed' ex convicts whom the joke-in-chief has determined to be 'victims' of the capitalist system, among the radical college profs who own every lectern in the American higher ed system; among the alums, and academia recruited indoctrinees... yes, the obamessiah has a never ending supply of RED obajihadis, willing to wear exploding vests and dynamite rigged burqas for the sake of furthering the aims of those who are REALLY pulling the strings of this empty suit. -- I would include among the bomb-throwers the Hollyweird 'queens', pervs, divas and simian rappers, but.. nah.. these idiots are too self-absorbed and brain-dead to focus on anything other than riding the fame, cash and demagoguery train for as long as their 15 minutes last.
The problem here is that Dunn had the temerity to throw out accusations and slander - no doubt siced by her superiors - the admin could not support, provide evidence for, or answer once challenged. Once the pressure grew someone had to go..
Tsk, tsk... so Anita Dunn, WH Communications Director, and one more skunk in the middle of Obamanure's socialist highway, finally became ROADKILL; and all for the sake of expediency within this Neo-commie administration, which does not hesitate to eat its own when they become 'inconvenient'. Well, BOO-FREAKING-HOO!
Having worked under Mao-Bama's mouthpiece, Robert Gibbs (the WH's very own 'Michelin man', lard-butt and blimp-boy) whose job is to daily spout off the party line, then defend, spin, sugar-coat and conceal its full intent and toxicity. Policy, widely believed, is really dictated by those two utterly charming hatchet men, Rahmbo and AXelrod (how appropriate!). Anita was just the last rung on the responsibility-for -blunders ladder, and as such imminently expendable. As such then, having taken on a bigger enemy than Obi, Ra and AX could handle, she has become the 'casualty du jour.'
But let's be realistic here, M-Obidick plays only a minor role in the ideological chain of command; he's turned out to be the 'executor' of the orders, and the most prominent face fronting for the "Internationale" busy at work in present day Amerikka. And isn't that a swooning, breathless gathering of MSM suck-up sycophants, hanging on every word that comes from above, during the daily exercise of wasted time that goes by the name of " press conference"?
Still, the sad news about Anita deserves a moment of silence , let's not be as callous as Obummer who, while more occupied in a 'shout out' about Indian rights, was finally forced to address the 'man caused disaster' at Fort Hood. He was loath to call it what it what it was: a terrorist attack, as he urged 'not to jump to conclusions.'
So, one more hag thrown under the bus! -- But who's counting.. there's more where that one came from. Among the vast rolls of ACORN and SEIU, among the long list of 'socially redeemed' ex convicts whom the joke-in-chief has determined to be 'victims' of the capitalist system, among the radical college profs who own every lectern in the American higher ed system; among the alums, and academia recruited indoctrinees... yes, the obamessiah has a never ending supply of RED obajihadis, willing to wear exploding vests and dynamite rigged burqas for the sake of furthering the aims of those who are REALLY pulling the strings of this empty suit. -- I would include among the bomb-throwers the Hollyweird 'queens', pervs, divas and simian rappers, but.. nah.. these idiots are too self-absorbed and brain-dead to focus on anything other than riding the fame, cash and demagoguery train for as long as their 15 minutes last.
The problem here is that Dunn had the temerity to throw out accusations and slander - no doubt siced by her superiors - the admin could not support, provide evidence for, or answer once challenged. Once the pressure grew someone had to go..
Monday, January 12, 2009
What's next?
To my faithful audience of (possibly) two people, I would like to assure you that writing is my passion and truly, not being able to sit down with all calm and deliberation to share with you my thoughts on this blog is the constant worm that gnaws at my brain.
Too many things to do, too many distractions, too many duties and responsibilities... I keep on dreaming of the day when all things shall be possible, without feeling the gravitational pull of 'stuff' that screams out for attention, and results in predictable guilt when neglected. Even worse are the piles of papers on my desk that cry out for resolution, the mounds of bills that need payment to avoid the annoying reminders of bill collectors, as well as the substantial finance charges that accrue... aaargh!
However, there comes a point when, as the French say: 'ras le bol!' the cup overflows and I must give in to the impulse or... explode. I suspect I may be reaching that watermark. There are so many issues, cultural, personal, national, global, etc., going on in the world that 'require my opinion,' and I would be remiss were I to continue holding back.
The problem is in which direction to go, and where to start?
For a brief list of possible themes to consider:
1) I certainly think that reflections on my own mortality should be forthcoming.
2) The legacy and advice to my children, who may only read and consider it when I'm gone but, nonetheless, looking down from heaven I hope, I will consider this time well spent.
3) Various thoughts on apologetics.
4) Consideration or comments of the writings of various authors, saints, historians, OpEd page articles, that have impacted me greatly, and bloggers' musings, many infinitely wise, valid and to the point.
5) Am I over politics? Hey, I'm a Religious and Political animal. Many would tag me as abrasive, controversial and argumentative. NONSENSE! Just as many people need physical exercise for their well being, I need exercise of the mind to keep sane. Whether with myself, or with others, I need my daily ration of mental calisthenics.
The trouble here is that there are so few people willing to engage me. This is, to my mind, the result of a surprising intellectual laziness, of cowardice and, frankly, lack of cojones on the part of the general list of my acquaintances. Either they feel personally threatened, uncomfortable with the subject matter at hand, and/or unwilling to be driven to an edge in which they might be confronted with reason. Some, mainly the young, will tend to dismiss me as a perennial ranter, as though I have been living in a world that never really existed and is just now opening into great possibilities never thought of before. Fat chance!
My mother used to say that the devil knows more because he's old... than because he's devil. The hackneyed little phrase 'Been there...done that,' fits perfectly in this case. There's little I have not seen and, having put my trust in political rhetoric, not hoped for, only to be totally disappointed by a good 98% of those who promised pie in the sky. To say that the current political and moral climate give me little comfort is an understatement.
There are other points I will attempt to dwell on, but I will think of them as I go along, for now as usual, duty calls and I must end this.
However, I do not want to leave without paying tribute to a man of gigantic intellect who has just passed away: Richard John Neuhaus, theologian, author of several books, and founder and editor of 'First Things' magazine. Like Augustin, Thomas Aquinas, John Henry Newman, CS Lewis, GK Chesterton, etc. this man was one of those bright lights that graces humanity for a brief instant and leaves enough of his thought to influence it yet, unfortunately, his words will fall in the deaf ears of those who need them the most.
I like to think I could have met this man, because despite the fact that he hobnobbed with intellectual, political and religious celebrities, he was a first and foremost a parish priest whose soaring sermons never talked down to his mostly humble audience, somewhere in a New York parish. He was a confessor, youth advisor, community organizer, though in a GOOD WAY and for good causes (friend to Martin Luther King, no less!), not the type whose aim is to radicalize the country to turn into a socialist heaven.
Requiescat in pacem, Father Neuhaus. Please keep you appointment book open in heaven, and squeeze me in for a moment when I get there. I'd love to have a chat with you! BTW, I drooled when in your careful, measured, tone you laid out and dissected complicated issues as with a scalpel, like a gifted surgeon. And, what can I say... I loved your wicked wit! Michael Novak in his eulogy paid you a grand compliment, tongue in cheek he said you could be on occasion a master of 'humble ostentation.'
Too many things to do, too many distractions, too many duties and responsibilities... I keep on dreaming of the day when all things shall be possible, without feeling the gravitational pull of 'stuff' that screams out for attention, and results in predictable guilt when neglected. Even worse are the piles of papers on my desk that cry out for resolution, the mounds of bills that need payment to avoid the annoying reminders of bill collectors, as well as the substantial finance charges that accrue... aaargh!
However, there comes a point when, as the French say: 'ras le bol!' the cup overflows and I must give in to the impulse or... explode. I suspect I may be reaching that watermark. There are so many issues, cultural, personal, national, global, etc., going on in the world that 'require my opinion,' and I would be remiss were I to continue holding back.
The problem is in which direction to go, and where to start?
For a brief list of possible themes to consider:
1) I certainly think that reflections on my own mortality should be forthcoming.
2) The legacy and advice to my children, who may only read and consider it when I'm gone but, nonetheless, looking down from heaven I hope, I will consider this time well spent.
3) Various thoughts on apologetics.
4) Consideration or comments of the writings of various authors, saints, historians, OpEd page articles, that have impacted me greatly, and bloggers' musings, many infinitely wise, valid and to the point.
5) Am I over politics? Hey, I'm a Religious and Political animal. Many would tag me as abrasive, controversial and argumentative. NONSENSE! Just as many people need physical exercise for their well being, I need exercise of the mind to keep sane. Whether with myself, or with others, I need my daily ration of mental calisthenics.
The trouble here is that there are so few people willing to engage me. This is, to my mind, the result of a surprising intellectual laziness, of cowardice and, frankly, lack of cojones on the part of the general list of my acquaintances. Either they feel personally threatened, uncomfortable with the subject matter at hand, and/or unwilling to be driven to an edge in which they might be confronted with reason. Some, mainly the young, will tend to dismiss me as a perennial ranter, as though I have been living in a world that never really existed and is just now opening into great possibilities never thought of before. Fat chance!
My mother used to say that the devil knows more because he's old... than because he's devil. The hackneyed little phrase 'Been there...done that,' fits perfectly in this case. There's little I have not seen and, having put my trust in political rhetoric, not hoped for, only to be totally disappointed by a good 98% of those who promised pie in the sky. To say that the current political and moral climate give me little comfort is an understatement.
There are other points I will attempt to dwell on, but I will think of them as I go along, for now as usual, duty calls and I must end this.
However, I do not want to leave without paying tribute to a man of gigantic intellect who has just passed away: Richard John Neuhaus, theologian, author of several books, and founder and editor of 'First Things' magazine. Like Augustin, Thomas Aquinas, John Henry Newman, CS Lewis, GK Chesterton, etc. this man was one of those bright lights that graces humanity for a brief instant and leaves enough of his thought to influence it yet, unfortunately, his words will fall in the deaf ears of those who need them the most.
I like to think I could have met this man, because despite the fact that he hobnobbed with intellectual, political and religious celebrities, he was a first and foremost a parish priest whose soaring sermons never talked down to his mostly humble audience, somewhere in a New York parish. He was a confessor, youth advisor, community organizer, though in a GOOD WAY and for good causes (friend to Martin Luther King, no less!), not the type whose aim is to radicalize the country to turn into a socialist heaven.
Requiescat in pacem, Father Neuhaus. Please keep you appointment book open in heaven, and squeeze me in for a moment when I get there. I'd love to have a chat with you! BTW, I drooled when in your careful, measured, tone you laid out and dissected complicated issues as with a scalpel, like a gifted surgeon. And, what can I say... I loved your wicked wit! Michael Novak in his eulogy paid you a grand compliment, tongue in cheek he said you could be on occasion a master of 'humble ostentation.'
Tuesday, November 4, 2008
To my children... and whoever else might be interested
One last plea for sanity.
--Rights are not created or granted by government, they pertain to the realm of the 'Moral Law,' hence, they are given by God. Government exists ONLY to protect the people who give it power over them from having those rights taken away. --
As the argument among the ‘new enlightened’ runs: Abortion is ONLY ONE ISSUE in an election that has more important matters and issues to be decided, such as the economy and the war in Iraq.
However, reason, conscience, truth and righteousness not only demand, but scream out loud: NO! Abortion IS NOT ONE among many other issues…. IT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE, because THE RIGHT TO LIFE IS THE ONE DEFINING ISSUE for humanity.
If no people remain to grant rights to, or take away rights from... who or what then remains?
Government then, is the servant of the people, not its master, therefore, government’s usefulness, purpose and duties are subservient to those it governs, NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND. That being the case, government’s primary role is that of keeping its citizens safe.
Further, the Constitution of the US spells this clearly: This is a government FOR THE PEOPLE AND BY THE PEOPLE. It also says that the people who are governed by it are endowed, NOT by the government, but BY THEIR CREATOR with INALIENABLE RIGHTS to LIFE, LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS.
The right to life was purposely put ahead of the other two because if life does not exist, the other two are meaningless.
Additionally, the Constitution declares that: NO STATE shall create laws that might imperil or abridge such rights.
The fact is that presently the state, through courts motivated by political reasons and outright biases, have arbitrarily superseded and nullified the will of the very people who initially granted it power to govern them, the very people they swore to serve. They have taken away rights from the majority, not in order to protect them, but to favor small groups of vocal, well funded minorities with very specific agendas. These minorities are intent on willfully subverting and misconstruing the wording of the Constitution to acquire for themselves rights and privileges completely unrelated to the meaning and intent of the framers.
Taking rights away from human beings -as it has happens yearly to approximately one and a half million infants inside a mother's womb since the passage of Roe v. Wade- is the ultimate aberration, the ultimate INSANITY perpetrated by a government over its own people.
If we logically examine the thought of such infamy and take it to its most elementary meaning, we end up with the EXTINCTION OF THE HUMAN SPECIES. This is occurring gradually through the silent GENOCIDE taking place since abortion became an arbitrary 'right.'
But what exactly is this 'right to choose' that radical feminism -aided by the media, by craven 'Hollywood values,' and by liberal courts- argues for? Despite the sophistry and verbal engineering imposed by the proponents of 'choice,' what we are talking about is nothing less than the right to kill one's own offspring. In other words, the right to commit MURDER! Yes, let's say it: it is the 'choice to either kill or to allow a human being to live,' plain and simple.
To re-state, there are quite a few questions pertinent to the subject of government and people that need to be seriously examined, they are as follows:
--If it is people who give power to government, but there are no people to either grant the power to govern or be governed, then does government exist?
--If the primary duty of government is to keep its people safe, but instead it turns against them by creating arbitrary laws which result in the destruction of the people, then has government exceeded and abused the power it was granted?
--If a defenseless human being cannot be safe in the place where it should feel most safeguarded --his mother’s womb-- then where exactly can a human being feel safe?
--If a mother cannot keep her own children safe, then who can?
--If a government makes laws to destroy its own citizens, then how can it keep them safe from enemies?
--If there is no peace between the government and its citizens, can there be peace between a government and the citizens of other countries?
--If there are no citizens to govern because they have been contracepted, aborted, and euthanized into non-existence, of what purpose then is government?
Many have argued that the immorality of killing people in an ‘unjust war’ trumps all other arguments as a reason to vote in politicians who not only advocate for abortion, but use the issue to attract votes from those who would profit politically and financially from its imposition.
Others also argue that the political 'right' cannot argue for the preservation of life in the womb, while it advocates 'capital punishment.'
On this point here is, however, no possible moral equivalence between the two issues.
Anyone willing to honestly use morality and logic to examine the enormous injustice of abortion will conclude that there is no possible rational justification for it. Abortion, by its own nature, is ultimately an act of intrinsic, unequivocal evil because it is the act of killing an innocent, defenseless, voiceless human being, while the killing of a heinous criminal involves first, a careful process of finding evidence of the criminal's culpability, and then seeking justice. Not until that process has been fully exhausted it is decided that society is better protected and served by not keeping the criminal alive. Equally, on the subject of what is called 'a just war,' there are cases in which a war must be conducted in order to save the citizens from a greater danger. One simply has to contemplate the consequences of remaining passive in the face of Hitler's rape of Europe and, yes, even in the case of the existence of weapons of mass destruction in the hands of unstable and fanatical Middle Eastern regimes. The following link will provide chilling proof of why sane people cannot afford to remain naive or complacent:
http://www.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=o861ff3eabea1ceb73e4%20
(If link as written here does not work by simply pressing on it, then copy and paste onto search engine, but whatever you do, don't fail to see it as well as other ones in the same website put on by Al-Jazeera regarding the 'rights and privileges of women' in muslim countries).
In sum, there exists no moral 'principle of proportionality' that can equate war or capital punishment to the evil of abortion, because abortion is aimed at the extinction of life for the purpose of convenience which, taken to its most drastic consequence, will lead humanity to extinction by its own hand.
As a human being with a moral conscience and compassion for those innocents who cannot speak for themselves, and as a mother, I have dared to speak out against this evil out of grave concern. Therefore, here’s is a final warning from a mother who begs her children to use their Catholic upbringing, their own moral conscience and compassion to awaken them from this unpardonable sin:
From the words of Malachi in Old Testament -which can in some instances be rather harsh, but for the moment we will forgo the digression into Theology- the Lord says:
“If I say to the wicked, ‘You shall surely die,’ and you give him no warning, nor speak to warn the wicked from his wicked way, in order to save his life, that wicked man shall die in his iniquity; but his blood I will require at your hand. But if you warn the wicked and he DOES NOT turn from his wickedness, or from his wicked way, he shall die in his iniquity; but you will have saved your life.
Again if a righteous man turns from righteousness and commits iniquity, and I lay a stumbling block before him, he shall die; because you have not warned him, he shall die for his sin, and his righteous deeds which he has done shall not be remembered; but his blood I will require at your hand. Nevertheless if you warn the righteous man not to sin, and he does not sin, he shall surely live, because he took warning, and you will have saved your life.”
YES, WE ARE OUR BROTHER’S KEEPER! Even more so when our brother is a defenseless potential human being, endowed from the first moment of conception with every possible attribute and quality of the person he/she will have at the moment of birth, and at every moment thereafter until his/her death.
For some years going there has been enormous emphasis and indoctrination of schoolchildren regarding the proper stewardship of our planet's resources and the preservation of animal species. The question is, are seals, bears, turtles, etc. more valuable or worthy to be kept alive than human beings? If not, and they surely aren't, why do governments protect animals and prevent their extinction more vigorously than they do the life of human beings?
Still, as a human being of conscience it is not difficult to realize the fact that we live in a world where all living creatures are valuable not only for their utility to humans but because they enhance our quality of life. In this respect, long ago I learned long ago a lesson from my wonderful daughter which I have since followed religiously. She taught me to cut up the plastic rings that keep six packs of cans together so that sea animals, pelicans and other fauna would not be harmed by getting trapped by them when they become part of the debris that ends up in the sea.
Would that my two children hark back to the lessons in compassion, love of neighbor and respect for life they were once given, take a step back from the abys, from the temptation of giving power to people who will forcefully advocate and even impose the evil of abortion, and reconsider their vote.
With my heart in my hand I beg: please, please, please, reconsider! Your own future and that of your children is at stake.
Love, Mom
--Rights are not created or granted by government, they pertain to the realm of the 'Moral Law,' hence, they are given by God. Government exists ONLY to protect the people who give it power over them from having those rights taken away. --
As the argument among the ‘new enlightened’ runs: Abortion is ONLY ONE ISSUE in an election that has more important matters and issues to be decided, such as the economy and the war in Iraq.
However, reason, conscience, truth and righteousness not only demand, but scream out loud: NO! Abortion IS NOT ONE among many other issues…. IT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE, because THE RIGHT TO LIFE IS THE ONE DEFINING ISSUE for humanity.
If no people remain to grant rights to, or take away rights from... who or what then remains?
Government then, is the servant of the people, not its master, therefore, government’s usefulness, purpose and duties are subservient to those it governs, NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND. That being the case, government’s primary role is that of keeping its citizens safe.
Further, the Constitution of the US spells this clearly: This is a government FOR THE PEOPLE AND BY THE PEOPLE. It also says that the people who are governed by it are endowed, NOT by the government, but BY THEIR CREATOR with INALIENABLE RIGHTS to LIFE, LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS.
The right to life was purposely put ahead of the other two because if life does not exist, the other two are meaningless.
Additionally, the Constitution declares that: NO STATE shall create laws that might imperil or abridge such rights.
The fact is that presently the state, through courts motivated by political reasons and outright biases, have arbitrarily superseded and nullified the will of the very people who initially granted it power to govern them, the very people they swore to serve. They have taken away rights from the majority, not in order to protect them, but to favor small groups of vocal, well funded minorities with very specific agendas. These minorities are intent on willfully subverting and misconstruing the wording of the Constitution to acquire for themselves rights and privileges completely unrelated to the meaning and intent of the framers.
Taking rights away from human beings -as it has happens yearly to approximately one and a half million infants inside a mother's womb since the passage of Roe v. Wade- is the ultimate aberration, the ultimate INSANITY perpetrated by a government over its own people.
If we logically examine the thought of such infamy and take it to its most elementary meaning, we end up with the EXTINCTION OF THE HUMAN SPECIES. This is occurring gradually through the silent GENOCIDE taking place since abortion became an arbitrary 'right.'
But what exactly is this 'right to choose' that radical feminism -aided by the media, by craven 'Hollywood values,' and by liberal courts- argues for? Despite the sophistry and verbal engineering imposed by the proponents of 'choice,' what we are talking about is nothing less than the right to kill one's own offspring. In other words, the right to commit MURDER! Yes, let's say it: it is the 'choice to either kill or to allow a human being to live,' plain and simple.
To re-state, there are quite a few questions pertinent to the subject of government and people that need to be seriously examined, they are as follows:
--If it is people who give power to government, but there are no people to either grant the power to govern or be governed, then does government exist?
--If the primary duty of government is to keep its people safe, but instead it turns against them by creating arbitrary laws which result in the destruction of the people, then has government exceeded and abused the power it was granted?
--If a defenseless human being cannot be safe in the place where it should feel most safeguarded --his mother’s womb-- then where exactly can a human being feel safe?
--If a mother cannot keep her own children safe, then who can?
--If a government makes laws to destroy its own citizens, then how can it keep them safe from enemies?
--If there is no peace between the government and its citizens, can there be peace between a government and the citizens of other countries?
--If there are no citizens to govern because they have been contracepted, aborted, and euthanized into non-existence, of what purpose then is government?
Many have argued that the immorality of killing people in an ‘unjust war’ trumps all other arguments as a reason to vote in politicians who not only advocate for abortion, but use the issue to attract votes from those who would profit politically and financially from its imposition.
Others also argue that the political 'right' cannot argue for the preservation of life in the womb, while it advocates 'capital punishment.'
On this point here is, however, no possible moral equivalence between the two issues.
Anyone willing to honestly use morality and logic to examine the enormous injustice of abortion will conclude that there is no possible rational justification for it. Abortion, by its own nature, is ultimately an act of intrinsic, unequivocal evil because it is the act of killing an innocent, defenseless, voiceless human being, while the killing of a heinous criminal involves first, a careful process of finding evidence of the criminal's culpability, and then seeking justice. Not until that process has been fully exhausted it is decided that society is better protected and served by not keeping the criminal alive. Equally, on the subject of what is called 'a just war,' there are cases in which a war must be conducted in order to save the citizens from a greater danger. One simply has to contemplate the consequences of remaining passive in the face of Hitler's rape of Europe and, yes, even in the case of the existence of weapons of mass destruction in the hands of unstable and fanatical Middle Eastern regimes. The following link will provide chilling proof of why sane people cannot afford to remain naive or complacent:
http://www.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=o861ff3eabea1ceb73e4%20
(If link as written here does not work by simply pressing on it, then copy and paste onto search engine, but whatever you do, don't fail to see it as well as other ones in the same website put on by Al-Jazeera regarding the 'rights and privileges of women' in muslim countries).
In sum, there exists no moral 'principle of proportionality' that can equate war or capital punishment to the evil of abortion, because abortion is aimed at the extinction of life for the purpose of convenience which, taken to its most drastic consequence, will lead humanity to extinction by its own hand.
As a human being with a moral conscience and compassion for those innocents who cannot speak for themselves, and as a mother, I have dared to speak out against this evil out of grave concern. Therefore, here’s is a final warning from a mother who begs her children to use their Catholic upbringing, their own moral conscience and compassion to awaken them from this unpardonable sin:
From the words of Malachi in Old Testament -which can in some instances be rather harsh, but for the moment we will forgo the digression into Theology- the Lord says:
“If I say to the wicked, ‘You shall surely die,’ and you give him no warning, nor speak to warn the wicked from his wicked way, in order to save his life, that wicked man shall die in his iniquity; but his blood I will require at your hand. But if you warn the wicked and he DOES NOT turn from his wickedness, or from his wicked way, he shall die in his iniquity; but you will have saved your life.
Again if a righteous man turns from righteousness and commits iniquity, and I lay a stumbling block before him, he shall die; because you have not warned him, he shall die for his sin, and his righteous deeds which he has done shall not be remembered; but his blood I will require at your hand. Nevertheless if you warn the righteous man not to sin, and he does not sin, he shall surely live, because he took warning, and you will have saved your life.”
YES, WE ARE OUR BROTHER’S KEEPER! Even more so when our brother is a defenseless potential human being, endowed from the first moment of conception with every possible attribute and quality of the person he/she will have at the moment of birth, and at every moment thereafter until his/her death.
For some years going there has been enormous emphasis and indoctrination of schoolchildren regarding the proper stewardship of our planet's resources and the preservation of animal species. The question is, are seals, bears, turtles, etc. more valuable or worthy to be kept alive than human beings? If not, and they surely aren't, why do governments protect animals and prevent their extinction more vigorously than they do the life of human beings?
Still, as a human being of conscience it is not difficult to realize the fact that we live in a world where all living creatures are valuable not only for their utility to humans but because they enhance our quality of life. In this respect, long ago I learned long ago a lesson from my wonderful daughter which I have since followed religiously. She taught me to cut up the plastic rings that keep six packs of cans together so that sea animals, pelicans and other fauna would not be harmed by getting trapped by them when they become part of the debris that ends up in the sea.
Would that my two children hark back to the lessons in compassion, love of neighbor and respect for life they were once given, take a step back from the abys, from the temptation of giving power to people who will forcefully advocate and even impose the evil of abortion, and reconsider their vote.
With my heart in my hand I beg: please, please, please, reconsider! Your own future and that of your children is at stake.
Love, Mom
Saturday, October 4, 2008
On: "What should the media have asked Palin.."
Tsk, tsk... no one can keep the rabid lib-nutters happy. There was plenty of lip-smacking when they heard the right color (red and black), as well as appropriately interest-conflicted person was assigned the task of inquisitor at the VP debate. Some people posting on the Com(unist)edy Central blogs were swooning with glee.
What....? Why did their smirk vanish so quickly? They got their wish by having that ample-bodied figure (nah, she's just big boned!), asking the questions. Yeah, you know who I mean, the one with the ridiculous slime green outfit, and one more Obgasm inducing book about ObSama, on deck.
So...what happened? Did the questions turn out to be too tame for the lefties' taste?
Did Sarah disappoint them by not meeting the 'standard of stupid' they had had set for her in the month-long evisceration process carried out by the media, along with the sycophantic lunatic bloggers who visit all the sites cherished by the left ?
There was enough blood spilled at the Puffington Boast, the Daily Rant as well as the 'howl-oed halls' of Com(unist)edy Central to send a cruise ship to Scotland full of it processed into haggis. Those LCD mass-opinion- bending, near-funny guys, Stewart and Colbert could not get material fast enough to insidiously indoctrinate the faithful on how to best portray the object of their fears.
Gosh darn it! By heck! this woman through charm, honesty, candor and common sense might actually derail the unchained ObZero love-train.
You know, candid and honest are attributes the left has a reason to be panicked about. That tactic could ACTUALLY defeat the well planned and well heeled strategy - straight from Alinsky's method "Rules for Radicals" - that so far has been so fruitful and successful to those who serve as useful idiots to Soros and Co. To wit: The black-guilt ridden liberal whites intent on redressing past wrongs, the DemocRat party, the bull dykes who fund and protect Planned Murderhood, the various unions, ACORN, the entire DemoCreep Congress with Pelosi at the helm, and Barney Frank somewhere at his preferred 'tail-end' spot. If you know what I mean.
And they thought Rove was sinister? Fact is, in the Alinsky methodology these people are no better than cannon fodder. Of them the powers behind B. Hussein's campaign can truly say that, as it pertains to their purposes, 'The masses are Asses.'
Well, it's back to the drawing board for the bad guys. The job has just gotten a bit more difficult, but there's no shortage of bile or lies they will not employ or stoop down to in their quest to put a RED chimp in the oval office. Even as we speak, the latest load of manure being spread on the blogs. The buzz is that Palin wore an earpiece.
What I can say is that if that were the case one must truly stand in wonder of Palin. She must have one heck of a talent in order to absorb the text being passed on to her, and simultaneously move her lips. What a genius!
BTW, on the subject of Frank, has anyone stopped to notice the shape of his mouth as a 'full blown' pathetic down turned simian smile; something out of Il Pagliacci? Is it due to lack of teeth, or the result of more unrestrained, recreational, after Congressional duties activities?
What....? Why did their smirk vanish so quickly? They got their wish by having that ample-bodied figure (nah, she's just big boned!), asking the questions. Yeah, you know who I mean, the one with the ridiculous slime green outfit, and one more Obgasm inducing book about ObSama, on deck.
So...what happened? Did the questions turn out to be too tame for the lefties' taste?
Did Sarah disappoint them by not meeting the 'standard of stupid' they had had set for her in the month-long evisceration process carried out by the media, along with the sycophantic lunatic bloggers who visit all the sites cherished by the left ?
There was enough blood spilled at the Puffington Boast, the Daily Rant as well as the 'howl-oed halls' of Com(unist)edy Central to send a cruise ship to Scotland full of it processed into haggis. Those LCD mass-opinion- bending, near-funny guys, Stewart and Colbert could not get material fast enough to insidiously indoctrinate the faithful on how to best portray the object of their fears.
Gosh darn it! By heck! this woman through charm, honesty, candor and common sense might actually derail the unchained ObZero love-train.
You know, candid and honest are attributes the left has a reason to be panicked about. That tactic could ACTUALLY defeat the well planned and well heeled strategy - straight from Alinsky's method "Rules for Radicals" - that so far has been so fruitful and successful to those who serve as useful idiots to Soros and Co. To wit: The black-guilt ridden liberal whites intent on redressing past wrongs, the DemocRat party, the bull dykes who fund and protect Planned Murderhood, the various unions, ACORN, the entire DemoCreep Congress with Pelosi at the helm, and Barney Frank somewhere at his preferred 'tail-end' spot. If you know what I mean.
And they thought Rove was sinister? Fact is, in the Alinsky methodology these people are no better than cannon fodder. Of them the powers behind B. Hussein's campaign can truly say that, as it pertains to their purposes, 'The masses are Asses.'
Well, it's back to the drawing board for the bad guys. The job has just gotten a bit more difficult, but there's no shortage of bile or lies they will not employ or stoop down to in their quest to put a RED chimp in the oval office. Even as we speak, the latest load of manure being spread on the blogs. The buzz is that Palin wore an earpiece.
What I can say is that if that were the case one must truly stand in wonder of Palin. She must have one heck of a talent in order to absorb the text being passed on to her, and simultaneously move her lips. What a genius!
BTW, on the subject of Frank, has anyone stopped to notice the shape of his mouth as a 'full blown' pathetic down turned simian smile; something out of Il Pagliacci? Is it due to lack of teeth, or the result of more unrestrained, recreational, after Congressional duties activities?
Thursday, September 25, 2008
People voted for CHANGE in 2006
Remember the election of 2006? It was only 2 years ago.
So, I Thought you might like to read the following:
A little over one year ago:
1) Consumer confidence stood at a 2 1/2 year high;
2) Regular gasoline sold for $2.19 a gallon;
3) The unemployment rate was 4.5%.
THEN..,
Since voting in a Democratic Congress in 2006 we have seen:
1) Consumer confidence plummet;
2) The cost of regular gasoline soar to over $4.00 a gallon;
3) Unemployment is up to 5% (a 10% increase);
4) American households have seen $2.3 trillion in equity value evaporate (stock and mutual fund losses);
5) Americans have seen their home equity drop by $1.2 trillion dollars;
6) 1% of American homes are in foreclosure.
America voted for CHANGE in 2006, and we got it!
What is the slogan of B. Hussein ObSama? Are we ready for more of that?
Everyone blames Bush for the present economic situation, but does anyone remember it is Congress that makes law, not the President. He has to work with what's handed to him.
Does anyone question the fact that:
a) This is an election year, and that the present crisis and the timing are perhaps a bit too coincidental?
b) Some of the people that most benefitted from the financial failure of Wall Street, Fannie and Freddie are not only DemocRats, but are presently prominently employed by Barrack's campaing (Franklin Raines who made 90 Mill in only 6 years of working for Fannie, deeply connected to past Demo administrations of Carter and Clinton, and now a prominent advisor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin_Raines ; Jim Johnson (now gone to prevent embarrasement), and Stanley O'Neal of the failed Merrill Lynch who left the Co. with a 150 Mill bonus!)
c) That key Democrats - among them Christopher Dodd and ObSama himself - were the biggest beneficiaries of Fanny and Freddie's largesse?
Do we really want these guys managing the economy of the US? If in the past they have so greatly profited from those who have bankrupted the country, who do we think they'll be working for, if they are the very crooks who have brought us to the brink? Should we entrust them with the management of the bailout and 700 Billion of the taxpayers money?
So, I Thought you might like to read the following:
A little over one year ago:
1) Consumer confidence stood at a 2 1/2 year high;
2) Regular gasoline sold for $2.19 a gallon;
3) The unemployment rate was 4.5%.
THEN..,
Since voting in a Democratic Congress in 2006 we have seen:
1) Consumer confidence plummet;
2) The cost of regular gasoline soar to over $4.00 a gallon;
3) Unemployment is up to 5% (a 10% increase);
4) American households have seen $2.3 trillion in equity value evaporate (stock and mutual fund losses);
5) Americans have seen their home equity drop by $1.2 trillion dollars;
6) 1% of American homes are in foreclosure.
America voted for CHANGE in 2006, and we got it!
What is the slogan of B. Hussein ObSama? Are we ready for more of that?
Everyone blames Bush for the present economic situation, but does anyone remember it is Congress that makes law, not the President. He has to work with what's handed to him.
Does anyone question the fact that:
a) This is an election year, and that the present crisis and the timing are perhaps a bit too coincidental?
b) Some of the people that most benefitted from the financial failure of Wall Street, Fannie and Freddie are not only DemocRats, but are presently prominently employed by Barrack's campaing (Franklin Raines who made 90 Mill in only 6 years of working for Fannie, deeply connected to past Demo administrations of Carter and Clinton, and now a prominent advisor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin_Raines ; Jim Johnson (now gone to prevent embarrasement), and Stanley O'Neal of the failed Merrill Lynch who left the Co. with a 150 Mill bonus!)
c) That key Democrats - among them Christopher Dodd and ObSama himself - were the biggest beneficiaries of Fanny and Freddie's largesse?
Do we really want these guys managing the economy of the US? If in the past they have so greatly profited from those who have bankrupted the country, who do we think they'll be working for, if they are the very crooks who have brought us to the brink? Should we entrust them with the management of the bailout and 700 Billion of the taxpayers money?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)